…iTunes is in desperate need of an overhaul… and the iTunes platform itself is derided by many as slow and prone to crashes.
If that’s all it took to require an overhaul, Microsoft Office would be on its fifth overhaul right now.
Why is it when people deride software as “slow”, “bloated”, “crashes”, etc., their complaints always come with a raft of feature requests, as if the latter don’t contribute heavily to the former?
for a guy like Steve Jobs, when is enough, enough.
They sum up at the end by saying “In short, the iPad is stupid”.
I don’t care if they like the device, and their concerns on what Apple has “done” to the music industry are shared by many “old style” artists (i.e., those that started when physical media still ruled). I disagree, and think things would be much worse had Apple and others not provided a legal alternative for what was going to happen anyway, but I respect their opinion on it.
I also disagree that people are buying an iPad to figure out WTF it is. On the contrary, I believe people are buying an iPad because, once they actually use one, it’s immediately obvious what it is.
What I most take exception to is the “when is enough, enough” question. To me, there’s a massive shortsightedness in your views on technology when the crux of your argument is that somehow we’ve gone far enough with it, and apparently we can just stop now. Do these guys feel the same way about music?
Just received the above email. I download that episode long ago, and have watched it many times. No issues with it that I can remember. Still, Apple determined there was a problem, corrected it, and are making the new version available to those who bought it. Great service.
How-to procedures, and answering a few questions.
What I like best is that files are transferred to/from the device immediately (i.e., no sync is required).
Tomorrow is the big day, and by noon PT all will be revealed. I’m tossing my $.02 in the ring with some general observations about what Apple will announce. I’m not getting into detailed predictions — better men than I have failed miserable at guessing what Apple will do — but rather some overall comments I have after absorbing hype for the last few weeks.
The Name. I’d love Apple to avoid “tab” or “tablet” because those devices all failed. Why name after a failure? I can live with “Slate” or “iSlate”, though I’d prefer it be avoided since Apple’s competitors jumped on that bandwagon. Personally, I prefer “Canvas”, without the “i”. There’s a lot of talk about “iPad”, and while Canvas is better in my opinion I could live with that.
The OS. Yes, tomorrow we’ll see glimpses of iPhone OS (I’m convinced this thing will not run Mac OS) because they need to show the new features of the OS that allow the device to do what it does. Whether this is version 3.2 or 4.0 doesn’t matter to me. Of course it’ll multitask. No, I don’t think we’ll see a third specialized “tablet OS”. I think the iPhone OS (perhaps rebranded) will identify the hardware upon which it’s installed and act accordingly, much as Mac OS does with the multitude of Mac models now.
The Other Software. I’m sure we’ll see a new version of iTunes to support the new device. And we may see a new version of iWork if some of those apps have been modified to work with the device. I’m less certain of this one right now.
The Apps. Deal with it. There are going to be several demos of new or modified apps that show off the new device’s capabilities. If history is any guide there’ll be five or six of these, and many will consider it boring. But apps are what make any such device go, without them it’s just an exercise in hyperbole. Live bloggers will pander to their readers talking about how boring it is, but I say you shouldn’t be pro-developer when you’re courting favor, and then slam them when they’re actually showing their wares.
The Competition. I read books on my iPhone all the time (Kindle, Stanza, etc.). If this thing does it just as well but with the larger screen, I think even those who question book-reading on the iPhone will be swayed. Add to that the color screen, etc., and the Kindle, Nook, Sony devices are going to look like expensive jokes. I buy Kindle books, but I don’t care about the moves Amazon has done of late, and even if they offered a Scarlett Johansson lap dance there’s zero chance of me buying a Kindle for more dedicated e-reading now. (Sorry, Scarlett, it was really close.)
The Device. For the most part I’m staying away from this one. Partially because Apple is unconventional, and partially because it’s not hard to see why just about any given hardware feature could make sense. And yet, Apple will only implement a small number of them. It’s priorities. It’s Jobs saying “no” more than “yes”. It’s also about the new paradigm Apple is bringing to market. For example, why make it easy to use a keyboard if the new paradigm says you shouldn’t need one? Choice? It’s a fine line between “choice” and “legacy support”. If this device is meant to continue letting physical keyboards go (as the iPhone started), then you don’t have to make it easy to use one.
The Pundits. I would be willing to bet that, even as write this a day before the event, there are pundits writing their articles slamming the device. A few quick edits here and there and it’s published. If you think the heights of craziness peaked with the iPhone-slammers (teenagers dying while texting on a software keyboard), you ain’t seen nothing yet. Brace yourself for ridiculous punditry at it’s finest.
That’s it. Tomorrow the fun begins, and I look forward to the next step in computing even if I won’t know until later whether the device appeals to me personally or not.
CNN Money has a collection of a dozen photographs of Steve Jobs that show their “CEO of the Decade” in a more unusual light.
The above photo is #4 in the series, and my favorite by far. Anyone who doubts Jobs’ proclaimed love of music — a love that helped Apple build the iPod/iTunes ecosystem — need only look to this photo as proof they’re wrong.
Visit the link above to see all 12 photos.
Usage of any other company’s Vendor ID is specifically precluded. Palm’s expressed intent to use Apple’s VID appears to violate the attached policy.
This is exactly what Palm should have expected, and what others had predicted. It was a silly tack all along, and the USB standards body was right to slam them for it.
When reached for comment, Palm said “We hoped the standards group would cover our ass; we haven’t the expertise to write software as good as iTunes, and even if we did we haven’t the time until we go bankrupt. We slung around words like “freedom” and “open” and “choice”, hoping for some kind of Apple-basher backlash to support our hack, but the Pre is just too sucky and we didn’t get it. Now I don’t now what we’re gonna do.” The spokesperson then sobbed uncontrollably.
NOTE: The above paragraph is fiction. To my knowledge no Palm spokesperson actually said that (I bet more than a few were thinking it, though).